Lindsay Clancy Case: Murder Or Psychotic Break?
About this episode
Mark Geragos and Lauren Conlin discuss the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, exploring the question of criminal responsibility versus a psychotic break.
Mark Geragos is joined by Los Angeles Magazine reporter Lauren Conlin, filling in for Harvey Levin, to break down the deeply disturbing Lindsay Clancy murder trial. They examine the central question at the heart of the case — was Clancy criminally responsible for killing her three children, or was she suffering from a psychotic break? Mark and Lauren also discuss the prosecution’s controversial approach, a heated hot-mic moment in the courtroom, the defense attorney’s growing frustration, and a striking development involving the judge and another mental-health murder case. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
More episodes of 2 Angry Men
- Lindsay Clancy Retrial Will Fail
- Lindsay Clancy Won't Be Convicted Of Murder
- Could Hayden Panettiere's Boyfriend Be Prosecuted?
- Luigi Mangione: Free At 48 Years Old
- Nolan Wells Case: Will Racism Claims Cost Ben Crump?
- D4vd Case: Will Sex Sink Him?
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the 2 Angry Men podcast page.