About this episode
Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos discuss the legal implications of Mackenzie Shirilla's case as portrayed in Netflix’s The Crash.
Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos break down the legal questions raised in Netflix’s The Crash, debating whether Mackenzie Shirilla’s actions amounted to murder or manslaughter. The discussion focuses on intent, the significance of the vehicle’s black-box data, the decision to waive a jury trial, potential appeal strategies, parole implications, and the public perception of Shirilla’s parents, with both frequently taking opposing sides on the key issues. Hosts: Harvey Levin, Mark Geragos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
People in this episode
Hosts: Harvey Levin, Mark Geragos
Topics covered
- legal analysis
- murder vs manslaughter
- black-box data
- jury trial
- public perception
- appeal strategies
Keywords
- Mackenzie Shirilla
- murder
- manslaughter
- black-box data
- jury trial
- legal questions
- public perception
Mentioned in this episode
Books & works: The Crash
More episodes of 2 Angry Men
- Behind The Michael Jackson Verdict · June 6, 2026 · 33 min
- Spencer Pratt Will Kick Karen Bass’s Ass · May 23, 2026 · 35 min
- Why Harvey Levin Went After Spencer Pratt · May 17, 2026 · 36 min
- Blake Lively Lost Big in Baldoni Legal War · May 10, 2026 · 37 min
- D4vd Case: Something's Not Right · May 2, 2026 · 35 min
- D4vd Case: Was It Really Homicide? · April 25, 2026 · 33 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the 2 Angry Men podcast page.