Women and gender: Supreme Court ruling, one year on
About this episode
The episode discusses the implications of a Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman and its impact on women's rights and gender policies in the UK one year later.
This debate was part of Battle of Ideas North on 7 March 2026 in Manchester. ORIGINAL INTRODUCTIONThe Supreme Court judgement in April 2025, in the case of For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers, was seen as a ‘landmark ruling’ in clarifying the definition of a woman as based on biological sex at birth. The hope was that by clarifying the law, women’s rights, including single-sex spaces, would be protected and, more broadly, gender ideology would wither on the vine. Yet, almost a year on, many institutions have failed to stand by the definition of ‘woman’ set out in the ruling, instead promoting ‘trans-inclusive culture’. They have ignored the need to provide single-sex spaces for women, and retain policies that fuel discrimination against gender-critical staff, volunteers and visitors. Is this surprising when the UK government itself seems reluctant to fully pursue implementation of the ruling? Having been in possession for months of clear recommendations from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), Bridget Phillipson, the women and equalities secretary, has still to publish guidance on single-sex spaces. Similarly, the culture secretary, Lisa Nandy, has been…
More episodes of Academy of Ideas
- Comedy: is politics that funny?
- World Cup Podcast of Ideas: episode 1
- Rebuilding Britain: the infrastructure crisis
- Racial grievance politics: how did we become so divided?
- Is there a right to die? The moral dilemmas of assisted death
- Elections 2026: what next for populism, democracy, Starmer and the Union?
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Academy of Ideas podcast page.