All the Things Wrong with Trump’s Billion-Dollar Fund
About this episode
Sarah Isgur and David French analyze Trump's billion-dollar fund and discuss related legal issues and recent Supreme Court developments.
Sarah Isgur and David French analyze President Donald Trump’s $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund through the lens of three legal “buckets,” and talk about how federal appropriations work and the Obama-era case that hangs over this legal issue. The two also discuss the Supreme Court’s latest cert grant on a Title IX case, plus the circuit split brewing over the First Amendment and judicial elections. The Agenda: –Court agrees to hear case on the ability of employees to bring certain suits for sex discrimination –Going through the settlement agreement, it’s practically a blank check! –Todd Blanche essentially pardons Trump’s family –‘That’s not how appropriations work.’ –Georgia Supreme Court race finishes strong Show Notes: –Chief Judge William Pryor’s opinion –Anti-Weaponization Fund –Keepseagle v. Vilsack Advisory Opinions is a production of SCOTUSblog and The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a nonpartisan perspective. Click here to sign up for our new Advisory Opinions newsletter, and click here to access all of The Dispatch’s offerings, including audio versions of all our articles and newsletters. If you’d like to remove all…
More episodes of Advisory Opinions
- Can Transgender People Serve in the Military?
- Counting Down the Supreme Court Term
- Getting Out of the Redistricting Business
- President Trump’s Losing Streak
- District Map Fights Before the 2026 Midterms
- SCOTUS Through the Decades | Interview: Nina Totenberg
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Advisory Opinions podcast page.