About this episode

Gavin and Stephen discuss the implications of judges acting as social engineers, using the Waterloo homeless encampment decision as a case study.

Send us Fan Mail When judges become social engineers, democracy starts to wobble. Gavin and Stephen examine the Waterloo homeless encampment decision as a major example of courts moving beyond traditional Charter review and into the realm of public policy design. What began as a dispute over a municipal bylaw and a public parking lot becomes, in their view, a much larger warning about judicially engineered social outcomes, the constitutionalization of housing policy, the weakening of el...

People in this episode

Hosts: Gavin, Stephen

Topics covered

• judicial activism
• social policy
• housing rights
• democracy
• court decisions

Keywords

• judges
• social engineering
• democracy
• housing policy
• court decisions

Mentioned in this episode

Places: Waterloo

More episodes of Beneath the Law

• The Fake Case Crisis: How AI is Shaking Trust in the Courts · May 19, 2026 · 31 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Beneath the Law podcast page.