What’s next for Lindsay Clancy? Defense psychologist talks for first time about trial and next move
About this episode
Brian Entin discusses the implications of the Lindsay Clancy trial's mistrial with forensic psychologist Paul Zeizel and retired judge Carol Erskine.
The Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial on Friday — as questions linger about what will happen next. The District Attorney won’t say whether he will re-try her, though speculation among insiders is he will pursue a second trial including the 1st degree murder charge. In this episode, Brian talks with forensic psychologist Paul Zeizel who testified in the Clancy trial and spent countless hours evaluating her. Massachusetts Retired Judge Carol Erskine also provides context on possible appeal avenues Clancy’s attorneys could take. They can't harm you, if they can't find you! Use code brianentin at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/brianentin Watch the video version on YouTube…
Topics covered
- Lindsay Clancy
- trial
- forensic psychology
- legal proceedings
- mistrial
- appeal
Sponsors
Incogni
More episodes of Brian Entin Investigates
- Lindsay Clancy jurors speak, and postpartum psychosis survivor who lost custody of children shares ordeal
- Death of the Pastor’s Wife: Mica Miller’s last conversation with divorce attorney and why “nothing adds up”
- Will Lindsay Clancy attorney portray Patrick differently at next trial? Defense tactics could change
- Breaking: Lindsay Clancy trial takes unexpected turn with rogue juror who “won’t listen to the law”
- Lindsay Clancy verdict watch day 6 — can Jury come together? And intimidation suspect runs from courthouse
- Lindsay Clancy verdict watch — analyzing the jury from courtroom - what will happen next? Hung jury?
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Brian Entin Investigates podcast page.