Supreme Court Oral Argument: Cannabis Users, Gun Rights & 922(g)(3) (Bruin/Rahimi Analysis)
About this episode
This episode analyzes a Supreme Court oral argument regarding the intersection of cannabis use and gun rights under federal law.
Send us Fan Mail This episode breaks down excerpts from a Supreme Court oral argument about whether federal law 18 USC 922(g)(3) can categorically bar “unlawful” marijuana users from Second Amendment rights under the Bruin historical-tradition test and in light of Rahimi’s dangerousness focus. It highlights Justice Gorsuch questioning whether “habitual user” is defined too loosely compared to historical “habitual drunkard” laws, and similar concerns from Justices Sotomayor and Barrett about w...
People in this episode
Host: Cannabis Legalization News
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: Supreme Court
More episodes of Cannabis Legalization News Podcast
- Medical Marijuana Declared Federally Legal: Schedule III Shakeup, 280E Fallout, and Illinois Dispensary Updates
- DOJ’s Confusing Schedule III Move: Todd Blanche’s Treaty-Based Order Explained
- 420 Cannabis Legalization News: IRS Tip Taxes, Rescheduling ‘Slow Walk,’ Illinois Loans Stalled & Hemp Crackdown
- Cannabis Legalization News (April 12, 2026): Texas & Ohio Hemp Rulings, Schedule III Hold-Up, and Virginia Licensing Reality Check
- April 2026 Cannabis Policy “Shit Show”: Medicare CBD Rollout, Hemp Ban, Georgia Expansion, and State Licensing Frustrations
- Medicare Covers THC Now
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Cannabis Legalization News Podcast podcast page.