Should science stop worshiping statistical significance? (with Andrew Gelman)

Should science stop worshiping statistical significance? (with Andrew Gelman)

March 5, 2026 · 1h 20m

About this episode

The episode discusses the implications of statistical significance in research and the ethical responsibilities of researchers and critics.

Read the full transcript here. If you enjoy our podcast, we have some exciting news – we’ve just launched a new membership called Clearer Thinking Plus. Members get this podcast completely ad-free, as well as two professional coaching sessions every month, access to our advanced cognitive assessment, and seven other exclusive perks. Clearer Thinking Plus is one of the most affordable ways to get access to a high-quality coach - whether you want to improve your habits, find more effective ways to work towards your goals, or get assistance making difficult decisions. It is also a more affordable and convenient way to get all the perks we offer. If you're not interested in coaching, you can still get ad-free access to this podcast and the other perks with our explorer plan. Access www.clearerthinking.org/plus to become a member today. We hope to see you there! What makes a piece of research “public property,” and what ethical obligations does that create for critics and authors alike? When a result feels wrong but you can’t locate the “smoking gun,” how should skepticism be calibrated without sliding into cynicism? How can a field avoid mistaking the absence of obvious errors for…

People in this episode

Host: Spencer Greenberg

Guest: Andrew Gelman

Topics covered

Keywords

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Clearer Thinking Plus, Clearer Thinking, www.clearerthinking.org/plus

More episodes of Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg podcast page.