About this episode

Trent Horn discusses the reliability of ancient religious history in response to Joe Rogan's interview with Daniel Everett.

In this episode, Trent Horn responds to Joe Rogan’s interview with linguist Daniel Everett and the claim that ancient religious history is unreliable simply because we weren’t there to see it. Trent explains why this objection misunderstands history, applies a double standard to Christianity, and wrongly treats modern “immediate experience” as the only reliable way to know truth.

People in this episode

Host: Trent Horn

Topics covered

• Christianity
• history
• truth
• religion
• philosophy
• experience

Keywords

• Christianity
• history
• truth
• Joe Rogan
• Daniel Everett
• religion
• experience

More episodes of Counsel of Trent

• #1202 Three Coincidences That Prove God Exists - Trent Horn · September 2, 2026
• #1200 FFAF: When Apologetics Isn’t Enough (with Fr. Pine) - Trent Horn · August 28, 2026
• #1199 How One of My Smartest Critics Returned to Faith in God - Trent Horn · August 25, 2026
• #1198 Explaining Purgatory to a Protestant Pastor - Trent Horn · August 24, 2026
• #1197 FFAF: Reacting to Jonah Hill’s BJJ Rant - Trent Horn · August 21, 2026
• #1196 The Candace Owens/Andrew Wilson Debate (My Take) - Trent Horn · August 19, 2026

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Counsel of Trent podcast page.