
In this episode, A.R. explores the relevance of Samuel P. Huntington's Clash of Civilizations theory in the context of current global dynamics.
In Part 1 of this two to three-part series, host A.R. unpacks Samuel P. Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations and tests it against the world we actually live in. What we cover: The theory: Huntington’s civilizational blocs and “fault lines” The critique: simplifications, identity flattening, and “us vs. them” Real-world flashpoints: U.S.–China rivalry, Russia’s war in Ukraine, Gaza (2023–25), Taliban rule in Afghanistan, EU migration politics Paradoxes of power: U.S.–Saudi alignment, China brokering a Saudi–Iran détente, BRICS expansion Globalization’s countercurrent: interdependence, soft power, and transnational networks Alternative lenses: Francis Fukuyama: liberal convergence (End of History) Edward Said: critique of civilizational framing (Orientalism) Amartya Sen: overlapping identities (Identity and Violence) John Mearsheimer: realism and power over culture Joseph Nye: soft power, networks, and attraction 2025 outlook: slower U.S. growth, multipolar competition, and where civilizational narratives help—or mislead Key takeaways: Identity matters, but power politics, resources, and institutions matter too. “Clash” narratives can become political tools. The future looks less…
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Diplomacy and Discourse Podcast podcast page.