Backup backup backup backup argument
From Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps
April 6, 2026 · 1h 18m · Season 6 · Episode 13
About this episode
The episode recaps the oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara and analyzes the Court's decision in Chiles v. Salazar, while discussing the length of judicial opinions.
We recap and reflect on the oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara (the birthright citizenship case) and then analyze the Court's recent decision in Chiles v. Salazar, about the First Amendment limits on Colorado's conversion therapy ban. We also confront the taboo question: Are judicial opinions too long?
People in this episode
Hosts: Will Baude, Dan Epps
Topics covered
- birthright citizenship
- First Amendment
- conversion therapy
- judicial opinions
- Supreme Court
Keywords
- Trump v. Barbara
- birthright citizenship
- Chiles v. Salazar
- First Amendment
- conversion therapy
- judicial opinions
- Supreme Court
More episodes of Divided Argument
- Impregnable Citadel of Technicality · June 8, 2026 · 1h 13m
- Smooth Stone in the River · June 1, 2026 · 1h 11m
- Ninja Court Packing · May 19, 2026 · 1h 9m
- Majordoma · May 7, 2026 · 1h 1m
- Even Eve-ier · April 29, 2026 · 1h 1m
- Jezebel Shouting · April 2, 2026 · 38 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Divided Argument podcast page.