Driving Law Episode 443: Hit and Run Claims, Breath Test Refusals & a Police Cruiser on a Trailer

Driving Law Episode 443: Hit and Run Claims, Breath Test Refusals & a Police Cruiser on a Trailer

March 6, 2026 · 31 min

About this episode

The episode discusses a major court decision on hit-and-run claims and the challenges of breath test refusals faced by drivers.

This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko discuss a major Court of Appeal decision involving ICBC hit-and-run claims and whether victims must investigate crashes themselves in order to obtain compensation. The court ultimately rejected the idea that injured drivers should conduct their own investigations when police efforts have already failed to identify a suspect. They also examine a judicial review involving a roadside breath test refusal and the difficulties drivers face challenging Immediate Roadside Prohibitions. The discussion highlights how credibility assessments and vague roadside statements can be used to uphold driving prohibitions, raising broader concerns about fairness in the system. Plus, the Ridiculous Driver of the Week features an unbelievable police pursuit where a cruiser ends up high-centered on a trailer before another officer attempts a PIT maneuver. Check out the "Lawyer Told Me Not To Talk To You" T-shirts and hoodies at Lawyertoldme.com and "Sit Still Jackson" at sitstilljackson.com.

People in this episode

Hosts: Kyla Lee, Paul Doroshenko

Topics covered

Keywords

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: ICBC, Lawyertoldme.com, sitstilljackson.com

More episodes of Driving Law

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Driving Law podcast page.