New Government UFO Releases What Counts as Good Evidence
About this episode
The episode discusses the evaluation of UFO evidence with a focus on a scoring system applied to newly released government cases.
What counts as good evidence — and how do you actually score it? Ben de la Fontaine (research scientist, methodology lead at UFOEvidence.com) joins to walk through the UFOE scoring system live, applied to two newly government-released cases: Apollo 17 transcripts and the Aegean Sea Reaper drone incident — which maxed out the scale at a perfect 5. We also live-scored a third case with the audience, took Q&A, and got into what citizens should be doing right now to claim agency in the disclosure process rather than waiting on governments to tell us what's real. Join the UFOEvidence.com community and keep the conversation going on Discord — links below. + UFOEvidence.com + Join the UFOevidence community on Discord: https://discord.com/invite/a6R2NDMz5 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More episodes of EMERGENT - with Reed Summers
- Tracking UAP—Skywatcher, "The Dogwhistle," Aerial Intertercept and 11 Classes of UAP
- How UFOs Became a Cold War National Security Issue
- UAP Incursions over Military Bases and The Crisis of "Classifying Reality Itself"
- Convergent Coverup—Unmasking the Human/Non-Human Coverup
- Age of Disclosure | What Did We Learn? A Critical Analysis
- The New Science of Non-Human Intelligence (PART 1)
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the EMERGENT - with Reed Summers podcast page.