Judicial Discretion, Sentencing Advocacy, and a Proactive Compliance Model: Joseph De Gregorio - Part 2

Judicial Discretion, Sentencing Advocacy, and a Proactive Compliance Model: Joseph De Gregorio - Part 2

April 13, 2026 · 25 min · Episode 805

About this episode

In this episode, Tom Fox and Joseph De Gregorio discuss judicial discretion in sentencing and proactive compliance strategies in white-collar crime cases.

In this episode, Tom Fox welcomes former Wall Street trader Joseph De Gregorio, who was federally convicted and now applies a “compliance rebuild” methodology to demonstrate genuine remediation under legal scrutiny. This is Part 2 of a two-part podcast series. In Part 2, we cover how federal judges exercise broad discretion despite sentencing guidelines and often form views before the court based on the pre-sentence report and sentencing memorandum, with probation officers’ impressions shaped by a detailed defendant letter and authentic allocution; judges emphasize post-offense conduct and may discount lawyer advocacy. Joseph then summarizes patterns from 400+ white-collar cases, arguing that structural failures precede cultural and operational failures, and introducing the “access to scrutiny ratio” as the most predictive risk indicator. He lists five warning signals: unscrutinized top performers, known but unmapped monitoring gaps, unmanaged performance pressure, quietly resolved senior incidents, and compensation rewarding results without method (noting DOJ’s September 2024 ECCP update). He outlines a proactive Compliance Rebuild approach using human failure audits, reverse…

People in this episode

Host: Thomas Fox

Guest: Joseph De Gregorio

Topics covered

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: DOJ

More episodes of FCPA Compliance Report

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the FCPA Compliance Report podcast page.