‘That’s dangerous!’ | Prince Harry High Court case SPARKS press freedom and free speech fears
About this episode
Nicole Lampert discusses the implications of Prince Harry's High Court case on press freedom and privacy rights.
On Free Speech Nation, Journalist Nicole Lampert dissects the legal fallout after Prince Harry lost his High Court privacy case against the publisher of the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday. The Duke of Sussex and other prominent public figures had levelled 97 serious allegations of unlawful information gathering, including phone hacking and tapping, all of which were rejected for lack of evidence. As the former Daily Mail entertainment journalist who spent 5 hours testifying on the stand, Nicole offers a deeply personal behind-the-scenes look at the gruelling multi-million-pound battle. They explore the wider, dangerous implications this case has for British press freedom, the push by activist groups like Hacked Off for government-backed regulation, and why a truly independent press remains crucial to an open society. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
People in this episode
Guest: Nicole Lampert
Topics covered
- press freedom
- free speech
- legal case
- privacy
- media regulation
- celebrity news
Keywords
- Prince Harry
- High Court
- press freedom
- privacy case
- Daily Mail
- Hacked Off
- phone hacking
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, Hacked Off
More episodes of Free Speech Nation | GB News
- 'The mainstream DENIES far-left violence!' | Andy Ngo warns of THREAT of left-wing attack
- Free Speech Nation | Sunday 5th July
- Labour's Conversion Practices Bill is 'TERRIFYING for parents' - Barrister issues CHILLING warning
- 'Activist corruption' | Britain’s Muslim police association faces CRITICISM after DEFENDING Hamas
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Free Speech Nation | GB News podcast page.