About this episode

This episode distills insights from respected plaintiff trial lawyers on how jurors decide cases based on the framing and understanding of evidence.

Send us Fan Mail The idea that one piece of evidence wins a case is a myth. The trial lawyers securing the most significant verdicts today operate with a different understanding. Jurors do not decide cases based on facts alone. They decide based on how those facts are framed, sequenced, and ultimately understood. This episode distills insights from some of the most respected plaintiff trial lawyers in the country, all featured on Get in the Game with Brian Panish. It highlights the strategic ...

People in this episode

Host: Brian Panish

Topics covered

• trial strategy
• juror decision-making
• evidence presentation
• legal insights
• plaintiff advocacy

Keywords

• trial strategy
• jurors
• evidence
• legal insights
• plaintiff lawyers

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Get in the Game, plaintiff trial lawyers

More episodes of Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst

• Science of Justice -Preview Episode 23 · September 15, 2025 · 1 min
• The Watchdog Files -Brian's Consumer Perspective · July 23, 2025 · 40 min
• Essential Wisdom for Rising Attorneys · May 26, 2025 · 15 min
• Beyond Liability: Selecting a Jury for Punitive Damages · April 17, 2025 · 20 min
• Best of Trial Advocacy: Analyzing the Most Effective Opening Statements · January 30, 2025 · 24 min
• California Burning: Holding Utilities Accountable for Wildfire Devastation · January 11, 2025 · 30 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst podcast page.