Is the Callais Decision the New Jim Crow? | Zack Smith

Is the Callais Decision the New Jim Crow? | Zack Smith

From Heritage Explains by Heritage Podcast Network

May 6, 2026 · 16 min

About this episode

The episode discusses the implications of the Callais vs Louisiana ruling and its comparison to Jim Crow laws with guest Zack Smith.

Jim Crow laws are the blanket name given to the the state and local laws that pervaded the American South from the 19th century all the way to the 1960s, which were meant to enforce racial segregation. They limited the public services and facilities available to Black Americans. They included poll taxes, literacy tests, and other measures designed to limit the ability of Black Americans to exercise their right to vote. Jim Crow laws went the way of the dodo back in 1965, with the passage of the Voting Rights Act. Now, over eighty years later, the Supreme Court has passed down the Callais vs Louisiana ruling. The case deals with the courts interpretation of this law, and some are declaring this decision nothing less than the resurrection of Jim Crow. But is that the case? To find out, I sat down with Zack Smith, Senior Legal Fellow here at the Heritage Foundation. Email us with thoughts, questions, or suggestions: HeritageExplains@heritage.org Zack Smith on X: https://x.com/tzsmith

People in this episode

Host: Heritage Explains

Guest: Zack Smith

Topics covered

  • Jim Crow laws
  • racial segregation
  • Voting Rights Act
  • Supreme Court
  • Callais decision
  • legal interpretation

Keywords

  • Jim Crow
  • Callais decision
  • racial segregation
  • Voting Rights Act
  • Supreme Court
  • Zack Smith
  • legal analysis

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Heritage Foundation, Heritage Podcast Network

Places: American South

More episodes of Heritage Explains

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Heritage Explains podcast page.