Did Nick Reiner's Parents Lock In His Payout At Birth?

Did Nick Reiner's Parents Lock In His Payout At Birth?

June 12, 2026 · 16 min

About this episode

The episode discusses the legal battle over a trust established for Nick Reiner and its implications in a murder case involving his parents.

In the latest Nick Reiner case update, the fight over Rob and Michele Reiner's money turns on a document older than the internet: a trust established for Nick when he was an infant. That document is now the center of a probate war. According to Nick's petition, his parents didn't leave the payouts to anyone's discretion — they wrote "mandatory and unconditional" distributions into the trust itself, half due at age thirty, the rest at thirty-five. The filing argues this was a binding commitment, made "in the most binding way the law of trusts allows," that the money would belong to Nick no matter what. Decades later, that language may decide whether a man accused of killing his parents gets seven figures of their money to fund his defense. Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis walks through the evidence trail inside the filing itself: the distribution language and how courts actually treat it, the two-year gap between Nick's thirtieth birthday and the killings — during which the petition says he was never paid — and what that long, pre-existing withholding reveals about how the trustees viewed Nick before anyone died. Faddis also examines the petition's central…

More episodes of Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary podcast page.