Impeachment Trial 101 with UP Law Professor Paolo Tamase
About this episode
UP Law School Associate Dean Paolo Tamase discusses the differences between impeachment trials and regular courtroom trials with Howie Severino.
"The truth-telling makes the impeachment process worth it.” UP Law School Associate Dean Paolo Tamase explains to Howie Severino the various ways an impeachment trial is different from a regular courtroom trial. He warns against "over-judicialization," or getting bogged down in legal procedures, when an impeachment trial is more of a political process meant to ferret out the truth in service of accountability. Their conversation revisits previous impeachment cases, including the infamous "second envelope" vote that triggered EDSA 2 during the Joseph Estrada trial and the historic conviction of Chief Justice Renato Corona. Now that a Vice President is on trial, Atty. Tamase raises intriguing questions, such as in the event of her resignation in the middle of the proceedings, should the trial continue? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More episodes of Howie Severino Presents
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Howie Severino Presents podcast page.