Reexamination vs. IPR: Which is Better for Patent Owners?
About this episode
This episode discusses the strategic considerations for patent owners facing post-grant challenges at the PTAB versus the CRU.
Send us Fan Mail This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we discuss whether patent owners are better off facing post-grant challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). PTAB practitioners Matt Phillips and Kevin Greenleaf join host Gene Quinn for an examination of how patent owners and challengers should be strategically thinking about the shifting post-grant environment at the USPTO. Th...
People in this episode
Host: Gene Quinn
Guests: Matt Phillips, Kevin Greenleaf
Topics covered
- patent law
- post-grant challenges
- USPTO
- strategic thinking
- patent owners
- IPR
- reexamination
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Central Reexamination Unit, United States Patent and Trademark Office
More episodes of IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Proactive IP Risk Management: A Patent Litigator’s Perspective
- SEPs, Patent Pools and the Case for Market-Based IP Solutions
- High Performance, Hidden Struggles: The Human Side of IP Law
- The Patent Monetization Problem: How Innovation Without Return Distorts the Market
- WIPO in Focus: Beyond Treaties, Toward a Market-Driven IP System
- AI, Budget Cuts, and the Future of In-House Patent Teams
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the IPWatchdog Unleashed podcast page.