About this episode

Dr. Paola Tiedemann discusses her groundbreaking firearm detection research and its implications for training detection dogs.

Dr. Paola Tiedemann returns to break down the groundbreaking firearm detection research she conducted with Cameron over the past four years. As the newly promoted Director of the Institute for Forensic Sciences at Texas Tech University, Dr. Tiedemann reveals why training on gun oils, solvents, and bulk smokeless powder creates operational blind spots. What We Cover: Why training on diphenylamine (the "gun chemical") causes false negatives The magazine problem: loaded vs. unloaded smell completely different Old firearms in storage (5+ years unfired): can your dog find them? Why teaspoons of powder don't represent real ammunition odor amounts The untargeted approach: what dogs actually detect vs. what we think they detect Training variety is key: mixing full weapons, magazines, ammunition types This research challenges the widespread practice of training solely on firing residue, propellants, or cleaning solvents. Dr. Tiedemann explains why firearms that haven't been recently fired present a completely different odor picture—and why most firearm dogs aren't trained to find them. PART 2 drops next Friday covering the controversial Kong training study and what it means for…

People in this episode

Host: Cameron Ford

Guest: Dr. Paola Tiedemann

Topics covered

• firearm detection
• dog training
• operational blind spots
• odor detection
• research findings
• training methods

Keywords

• firearms detection
• gun oils
• solvents
• smokeless powder
• diphenylamine
• training variety
• odor detection
• firearm dogs

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Institute for Forensic Sciences, Texas Tech University

Products: KONGs

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the K9s Talking Scents podcast page.