About this episode

The episode addresses and corrects mischaracterizations of their proposal in Séb Krier's criticism of AI 2040: Plan A.

This criticism of AI 2040: Plan A by Séb Krier unfortunately seriously mischaracterizes our proposal. It also mostly contains flat assertions, not real argumentation, and the argumentation in it seems quite weak. While we appreciate constructive criticisms of Plan A, such as the ones by Tom Davidson, Richard Ngo, and 1a3orn, we feel the need to correct the issues in Séb's response. First, we’ll go over the specific false representations, and then we’ll give a point-by-point response. False...

People in this episode

Hosts: MKodama, Thomas Larsen

Topics covered

• AI criticism
• Plan A
• argumentation
• mischaracterization
• constructive criticism

Keywords

• AI 2040
• Plan A
• criticism
• argumentation
• misrepresentation

More episodes of LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

• "Recap of bike trip/street interviews across America" by cguth7 · July 20, 2026 · 10 min
• "I don’t think Claude is misaligned in ‘Agentic Misalignment Summer 2026 - Motivated Mislabeling’" by JohnWittle · July 17, 2026 · 26 min
• "Why I Left Google DeepMind" by TurnTrout · July 15, 2026 · 1h 15m
• "The mosquito bucket of doom works" by dominicq · July 15, 2026 · 10 min
• "The Whitney Biennial Should Admit That Emilie Gossiaux Wants to Fuck Their Dog" by jenn · July 14, 2026 · 17 min
• "The current bottleneck is political will, not research" by Charbel-Raphaël · July 12, 2026 · 47 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast page.