Episode 394: Mansplaining God to the Pope
About this episode
The episode discusses House Speaker Mike Johnson's theological interpretation of immigration policy in response to Pope Leo XIV's critique.
In this week’s episode, Bill and Scott are joined by their Onbudsman Emily Acrigg to unpack one of the oddest culture-war moments yet: House Speaker Mike Johnson mansplaining religion to the Pope. We dive into a recent article from The Daily Beast detailing how Johnson responded to Pope Leo XIV’s critique of U.S. immigration policy by offering up his own theological interpretation of Scripture — arguing that borders, assimilation, and strict civil authority are actually biblical. Was this a sincere religious argument, a political power play, or just an overreach? We break down what Johnson actually said (and the longer 1,300-word follow-up he posted on X), how the Pope’s comments on Matthew 25 about welcoming the stranger sparked this back-and-forth, and what this clash tells us about religion’s role in public policy.
More episodes of New Persuasive Words
- Episode 402: The Scandal of Particularity Revisited
- Episode 401: Whose Christian America?
- Episode 400: The Courage to Hope
- Episode 398: WWGD: What Would Genghis Do?
- Episode 397: Is this a Religious War?
- Episode 396: Was the Enlightenment a Mistake?
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the New Persuasive Words podcast page.