
This episode explores a perplexing legal argument regarding the introduction of a forged transcript as evidence in the trial of Judah Karkowsky.
In this episode we do a deep dive on one of the dumbest, most mind-bending, time-consuming arguments made by Karkowsky's lawyer during pretrial motions: The question of whether or not to allow Karkowsky to introduce a full copy of his forged transcript as evidence. But it was forged, you may ask? Shouldn't that preclude it from being held forth as an authentic piece of evidence? Nevertheless his lawyer persisted. If you haven't listened to parts one and two of this series, please listen...
Hosts: Asher Lovy, Ariella Goldberg-Kay
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Outcry podcast page.