Target Date Funds: More Flawed Than Advertised (E137)
About this episode
Jesse critically evaluates target date funds, highlighting their flaws and underperformance compared to low-cost index portfolios.
Target date funds can be good. But most are not. That's the uncomfortable fact we'll dive into in today's episode. Looking for a financial planner? → PlanWithJesse.com Jesse delivers a critical re-evaluation of target date funds—one of the most widely used "set-it-and-forget-it" retirement tools—arguing that while their simplicity is appealing, their real-world performance often falls short in meaningful ways. He begins by explaining how target date funds work, focusing on their defining features: the glide path (a gradual shift from stocks to bonds over time) and their structure as "funds of funds." From there, he highlights their massive dominance in retirement accounts following the 2006 Pension Protection Act, which positioned them as default investment options for millions of Americans. But the core of the episode centers on a striking finding from recent research: the average target date fund underperforms a comparable low-cost index portfolio by roughly 1% per year—an outcome driven primarily by higher fees, the inclusion of actively managed sub-funds, and tactical allocation decisions that attempt (and often fail) to outsmart the market. Jesse further explores the wide…
More episodes of Personal Finance for Long-Term Investors
- He Retired Early - Here's What No One Warned Him About (E136)
- Why Trump Accounts Fall Short (AMA, E135)
- Even Financial Advisors Misunderstand Monte Carlo Retirement Analysis (E134)
- Uncomfortable Truth: Great Investing Decisions Can Look Wrong For Years (E133)
- Are You in a "Goldilocks" Retirement Range? (E132, AMA)
- Less Wealth, More Certainty: Why Annuities Are Rarely Worth It (E131)
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Personal Finance for Long-Term Investors podcast page.