About this episode

Episode 390 explores the implications of choosing to communicate with like-minded individuals versus those with opposing views, revealing deeper theories of change.

Episode 390 of RevolutionZ asks would you rather speak to 2,000 people who already agree with you or 2,000 people who might vote for Trump? That choice sounds like a simple preference, but I argue it exposes something deeper: an entire theory of change. If we think a better world is unattainable, it’s rational to aim for narrow wins, entertain friendly audiences, and avoid the hard work of persuasion and unity. If we think systemic change is possible, then we have to communicate to grow our n...

People in this episode

Host: Michael Albert

Topics covered

• communication
• persuasion
• political discourse
• theory of change
• systemic change

More episodes of RevolutionZ

• Ep 391 Vincent Emanuele on the Data Center Resistance and Organizing · May 31, 2026 · 1h 28m
• Ep 389 Francine Mestrum On Obstacles to Winning · May 17, 2026 · 48 min
• Ep 388 WCF Today and Tomorrow, Final Ending or New Beginning · May 10, 2026 · 1h 7m

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the RevolutionZ podcast page.