About this episode

David R. Legates discusses the implications of the sue-and-settle practice in shaping public policy.

What happens when lawsuits quietly shape public policy—without a full trial, public scrutiny, or legislative debate? In this episode of Sanity Check, David R. Legates unpacks the controversial practice known as “sue-and-settle.” What begins as a seemingly straightforward legal mechanism—citizens holding agencies accountable—can, in practice, become something far more complex. Through negotiated settlements between advocacy groups and federal agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, ...

People in this episode

Host: David R. Legates

Topics covered

• lawsuits
• public policy
• sue-and-settle
• advocacy groups
• federal agencies

Keywords

• lawsuits
• public policy
• sue-and-settle
• Environmental Protection Agency
• advocacy groups

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Environmental Protection Agency

More episodes of Sanity Check

• The Myth of Environmental Tipping Points · April 24, 2026 · 11 min
• How Solid Is the Data Behind Climate Claims? · April 10, 2026 · 12 min
• Greenwashing and Greenhushing · April 3, 2026 · 10 min
• Is Climate Change Driving Insurance Costs? · March 27, 2026 · 17 min
• Is Capitalism Bad for the Environment? Part 2 · March 20, 2026 · 17 min
• Introducing Sanity Check: A New Chapter for the Cornwall Alliance Podcast · March 13, 2026 · 4 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Sanity Check podcast page.