Sari Swears Podcast: Three Components of Any Damages Argument

Sari Swears Podcast: Three Components of Any Damages Argument

From Sari Swears by Sari de la Motte

May 22, 2026 · 22 min · Season 8 · Episode 35

About this episode

Sari de la Motte discusses the three essential components of any damages argument in legal cases.

Most lawyers focus on how to argue damages. Very few spend enough time truly understanding the loss. And jurors can feel that. In this week's episode, I break down the 3 components every damages argument needs: Understanding the loss Valuing the loss Communicating the loss We also talk about: Why metaphor matters How small stories hit harder than big explanations A simple framework I use to think about non-economic damages Because damages aren't about formulas. They're about helping jurors understand what was taken. Love, Sari P.S. If this episode hit home for you, my live webinar on May 28th is going even deeper into how the H2H Method™ helps jurors connect to what actually matters in trial. We're going beyond the FHTH book and into what works in today's courtrooms. Register now → sariswears.com/webinar Quote: "When everything says trial should be this very formal, sterile process, we have to fight against that. It's a very human process. The things jurors talk about in voir dire — family, health, purpose, connection — those are the exact things your plaintiff lost." Sari de la Motte Can't get enough of me? Connect with me here: Instagram…

People in this episode

Host: Sari de la Motte

Topics covered

  • damages argument
  • understanding loss
  • valuing loss
  • communicating loss
  • juror connection
  • metaphor in law

Keywords

  • damages
  • jurors
  • loss
  • metaphor
  • non-economic damages
  • trial
  • H2H Method

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: H2H Method™

More episodes of Sari Swears

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Sari Swears podcast page.