About this episode

This episode explores the disconnect between a strong legal case and jurors' perceptions, highlighting factors that influence verdicts.

Send us Fan Mail Your case looks strong inside the war room. The facts line up. The liability theory works. The experts check every box. Then the jury sees a different case. This episode examines the gap between the visible case and the perceived case. Why legally strong cases still fail. Why jurors resist narratives that make perfect sense to lawyers. And how small details, witness behavior, and personal beliefs quietly shape verdicts. This episode breaks down: Why jurors evaluate cases t...

More episodes of Science of Justice

• The Human Weight of Plaintiff Advocacy · May 27, 2026 · 32 min
• What Jurors Actually Hear During Closing Arguments · May 21, 2026 · 32 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Science of Justice podcast page.