About this episode

The episode discusses a significant ICE whistleblower hearing that revealed serious issues regarding constitutional rights and contrasts it with other congressional hearings.

Last month, there was a devastating hearing featuring a victim of ICE, an ICE whistleblower, and a previous DHS attorney. It revealed what, in any other time, would have been a massive scandal likely resulting in multiple firings. But we live in the bad times, which means this hearing took place in a maintenance shed barely on Congressional property during lunchtime put on by a ragtag team of the few remaining people who give a shit about constitutional rights. I take you through the hearing, and then next episode we're going to compare this to the Minnesota fraud hearings, of which the MAGA controlled congress has had... 3? 4? There is a marked difference in the seriousness of the people involved.

People in this episode

Host: Unknown

Topics covered

• ICE
• whistleblower
• DHS
• Congress
• constitutional rights
• scandals
• government hearings

Keywords

• ICE
• whistleblower
• DHS
• Congress
• constitutional rights
• scandal
• Minnesota fraud hearings

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: ICE, DHS, MAGA

More episodes of Serious Inquiries Only

• SIO511: What a Recent Chappell Roan Incident Teaches Us About Sexism · April 18, 2026 · 1h 0m
• SIO510: Digging Into the Science of the Placebo Effect · April 12, 2026 · 56 min
• SIO509: What Project Hail Mary Gets Right (And Very Wrong...) About Biology · April 4, 2026 · 56 min
• SIO508: The Data Shows That Authoritarianism Is Very Often Successfully Reversed. Yes, Really. · March 31, 2026 · 1h 11m
• SIO507: Shirley You're Joking, Minnesota Fraud Man! · March 26, 2026 · 44 min
• SIO506: Minnesota Fraud and the Death of Information · March 24, 2026 · 48 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Serious Inquiries Only podcast page.