
This episode features a discussion with former law school admissions officers about insider strategies and common misconceptions in the law school application process.
In this episode of Status Check with Spivey , Anna Hicks-Jaco has a conversation with two of Spivey’s newest consultants—Sam Parker, former Harvard Law Associate Director of Admissions, and Julia Truemper, former Vanderbilt Law Associate Director of Admissions—all about the law school admissions advice that admissions officers won’t give you, discussing insider secrets and debunking myths and common applicant misconceptions. Over this hour-and-twenty-minute-long episode, three former law school admissions officers talk about the inner workings of law schools’ application review processes (31:50), the true nature of “admissions committees” (33:50), cutoff LSAT scores (23:03, 46:13), what is really meant (and what isn’t) by terms such as “holistic review” (42:50) and “rolling admissions” (32:10), tips for interviews (1:03:16), waitlist advice (1:15:28), what (not) to read into schools’ marketing emails (10:04), which instructions to follow if you get different guidance from a law school’s website vs. an admissions officer vs. on their application instructions on LSAC (14:29), things not to post on Reddit (1:12:07), and much more. Two other episodes are mentioned in this podcast…
Host: Anna Hicks-Jaco
Guests: Sam Parker, Julia Truemper
Books & works: Status Check with Spivey, LSAT, Making Your Law School List: Advice & Resources for Deciding Where to Apply “Safety Schools
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Status Check with Spivey podcast page.