About this episode

This episode discusses the critical aspects of homeopathic case management following remedy administration.

Choosing the remedy is only one part of homeopathic practice. What happens next may be even more important. In this episode of Strange, Rare & Peculiar , Denise Straiges and Alastair Gray continue the conversation from case analysis into case management : how a homeopath evaluates the action of a remedy after it has been given. Was that reaction an aggravation? A proving symptom? A return of an old symptom? A sign that the dose needs to be adjusted? Or a reason to retake the case? This episode asks some of the most important clinical questions in homeopathy: How do we know what the remedy is doing? How do we manage chronic cases over time? And what happens when multiple remedies, repeated potencies, nosodes, sarcodes, and “clearing” protocols make it impossible to know what actually happened? Denise and Alastair also discuss why single-remedy homeopathy is not just a philosophical preference, but a practical foundation for safety, observation, and clear clinical decision-making. When too many interventions are layered together, the homeopath may lose the very thing needed to manage the case: the ability to evaluate the remedy response. They also touch on remedy reactions…

People in this episode

Host: Denise Straiges

Guest: Alastair Gray

Topics covered

• homeopathic case management
• remedy evaluation
• chronic cases
• remedy reactions
• clinical decision-making

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: The Institute for the Advancement of Homeopathy

More episodes of Strange Rare Peculiar Homeopathy Podcast

• 124: Homeopathy Best Practices: Beyond the Remedy · July 15, 2026 · 57 min
• 123: Healing vs. Hype: What to Expect With Homeopathy · July 7, 2026 · 52 min
• 121: Homeopathy Case Analysis: Why One Method Isn’t Enough · June 23, 2026 · 1h 8m

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Strange Rare Peculiar Homeopathy Podcast podcast page.