
The episode discusses the risks and costs associated with the US plans to build new nuclear weapons, featuring insights from Dr. Dylan K. Spaulding.
Nuclear weapons have been with us for 80 years. There are fewer today than was the case at the height of the Cold War, but there are more countries with nukes than ever before. Some heads of state have been, of late, threatening to use them. If you’ve seen Kathryn Bigelow’s recent film, “House of Dynamite,” you’ll know that human psychology is the linchpin on which the entire system of nuclear deterrence rests: would the President (or Premier or whatever) exchange their capitals for others? Trade Washington, DC for Moscow or Beijing? There is reason to be concerned about this question: The United States is planning a $1.7 trillion overhaul of its entire nuclear arsenal, designing new warheads and investing in new bombers, missiles, and submarines to carry them, all in the name of “modernization.” It’s not that the current generations of platforms and warheads won’t work; it’s more that Admirals, Generals and Presidents don’t trust devices put into operation when they were very young and that there is a lot of money and prestige in having the latest generation of gadgets and lording that over the competing services. Oh, and new weapons are “manlier” than the old ones. Join host…
Host: Ronnie Lipschutz
Guest: Dr. Dylan K. Spaulding
Organizations: Union of Concerned Scientists
Books & works: House of Dynamite
Places: United States, Moscow, Beijing
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Sustainability Now! on KSQD.org podcast page.