Confidentiality in Supervision – Ellen A. Sparer
About this episode
Ellen A. Sparer explores the paradox of confidentiality in psychoanalytic supervision and its implications for the analytic process.
What happens when the analytic setting—built on confidentiality and silence—meets the institutional demands of psychoanalytic training? Can the frame of supervision truly preserve the integrity of the analytic pact, or does it inevitably put it at risk? In this episode, Ellen Sparer explores a central paradox in psychoanalytic formation: the tension between the confidentiality of analytic work and the structural requirements of supervision. Drawing from her experience at the Paris Psychoanalytic Institute, she asks whether supervision risks undermining the very foundation of the analytic situation—what Freud, in An Outline of Psychoanalysis, described as a pact in which “the patient’s sick ego promises us the most complete candour…” while “we, on the other hand, assure him of the strictest discretion.” Through reflections on André Green, José Bleger, and Freud’s concept of disavowal, Sparer examines what she calls a “noisy contradiction”—a situation in which the analyst-in-formation becomes both observer and observed, and where the silence essential to the analytic space is disturbed by institutional structure. She invites us to consider the Institute’s role as a symbolic…
More episodes of Talks On Psychoanalysis
- The Body as a Pulsing Frontier - Ema Ponce de León
- Vicissitudes of Transience - Jhuma Basak
- Transience and the prohibition of “Don’t Look” - Osamu Kitayama
- The Body and Compulsion in Childhood - Christine Anzieu-Premmereur
- The Mystery, Again - Mariano Horenstein
- On Paternal Presence - Heribert Blass
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Talks On Psychoanalysis podcast page.