Trump v. Slaughter Part III: Creating Monsters to Destroy
About this episode
Spencer and Ryan discuss the implications of the arguments in favor of Rebecca Slaughter in the context of the Trump v. Slaughter case.
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit claremontinstitute.substack.com In anticipation of an eventual Trump v. Slaughter ruling, Spencer and Ryan follow up last week’s special episode by outlining the arguments in favor of ex-FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. After Clarence Thomas and the other Court conservatives prodded Slaughter's representative Amit Agarwal, it turned out that the respondents' argument could, in principle, be used to engineer a wholesale takeover of government power by Congress and the administrative state. Will Humphrey's Executor be overturned? Ryan and Spencer make their bets.
People in this episode
Hosts: Spencer, Ryan
Topics covered
- Trump v. Slaughter
- government power
- administrative state
- Supreme Court
- legal arguments
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: FTC, Claremont Institute
More episodes of The American Mind Podcast
- Cloak and Docket
- Trump v. Slaughter Part II: Look at Me, I am the Government Now
- Chimping Out
- The Administrative State in the Slaughterhouse, Part I
- Genocide or Hyperbole?
- Dispatch from Japan, Part III: Trumpism
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The American Mind Podcast podcast page.