Plato vs. Aristotle: A Fundamental Divide? With Dr. Rares Marinescu

Plato vs. Aristotle: A Fundamental Divide? With Dr. Rares Marinescu

From The Dionysius Circle Podcast by Samuel Walker Bennett

February 28, 2026 · 1h 10m

About this episode

The episode explores the fundamental disagreements between Plato and Aristotle with Dr. Rareș Ilie Marinescu.

In this episode, Sam Bennett speaks with Dr. Rareș Ilie Marinescu about the depth of the disagreement between Plato and Aristotle. Rareș is a Postdoctoral Fellow in Classics at the University of Toronto and the author of Proclus on Aristotle on Plato: A Case Study on Motion. Do Plato and Aristotle merely disagree at the surface level, or do they diverge at the level of first principles? Is motion ultimately explained by a self moving soul or by an unmoved intellect? Can a self moving soul truly ground the motion of bodies, or must the ultimate source of motion be entirely unmoved? Is Aristotle's unmoved mover only a final cause, or does it also produce being? Did Aristotle deny the existence of the One, and if so, what follows from that denial? If the highest principle is misidentified, does the entire metaphysical system shift with it? Through the lens of Proclus, this discussion moves from kinematics to psychology to theology, asking if Plato and Aristotle can be harmonized.

People in this episode

Host: Samuel Walker Bennett

Guest: Dr. Rareș Ilie Marinescu

Topics covered

  • Plato
  • Aristotle
  • philosophy
  • metaphysics
  • motion
  • theology

Keywords

  • Plato
  • Aristotle
  • motion
  • metaphysics
  • philosophy
  • theology
  • self moving soul
  • unmoved mover

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: University of Toronto

Books & works: Proclus on Aristotle on Plato: A Case Study on Motion

More episodes of The Dionysius Circle Podcast

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Dionysius Circle Podcast podcast page.