Why Your Inclusion Wins May Be Based on False Evidence
From The Element of Inclusion by Dr Jonathan Ashong-Lamptey Diversity & Inclusion I Broadcaster I Speaker I Protagonist
June 9, 2026 · 10 min
About this episode
This episode discusses the pitfalls of relying on circumstantial evidence in inclusion results and how to establish true causation.
If your inclusion results rest on circumstantial evidence, you take credit you cannot defend. Here I explain how to prove causation. In this episode we cover: How circumstantial evidence masquerades as proof Why good work can produce wrong conclusions How the 3 I’s test causation If you’re finding that you can’t prove your results actually … Why Your Inclusion Wins May Be Based on False Evidence Read More »
People in this episode
Host: Dr Jonathan Ashong-Lamptey
Topics covered
- inclusion
- causation
- evidence
- workplace
- conclusions
Keywords
- inclusion
- causation
- circumstantial evidence
- workplace conclusions
- 3 I's test
More episodes of The Element of Inclusion
- A 4 Step Framework For AI Fluency Leaders Need To Understand · June 2, 2026 · 12 min
- 9th Birthday Special: What I’ve Learned About You · May 26, 2026 · 18 min
- The Inclusive Question That Changed Everything · May 19, 2026 · 8 min
- Why The Long Way To Inclusion Is Actually The Shortcut · May 12, 2026 · 15 min
- Why Managing AI Is An Inclusion Problem · May 5, 2026 · 9 min
- Why AI Is Being Used As An Excuse To Stop Investing In People · April 28, 2026 · 11 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Element of Inclusion podcast page.