How to Think For Yourself When Everyone Disagrees With You
About this episode
Phil McKinney discusses how group dynamics can influence individual perceptions and the importance of voicing concerns in meetings.
When neuroscientists scanned the brains of people going along with a group, they expected to find lying. What they found instead was something far stranger. The group wasn't changing people's answers. It was changing what they actually saw . We'll get to that study in a minute. But first, I want you to remember the last time you were in a meeting, and you knew something was wrong. The numbers didn't add up. The risk was being underestimated. And someone needed to say it. Then the most senior person in the room spoke first: "I think this is exactly what we need." Heads nodded. Finance agreed. Marketing agreed. The consultant agreed. And by the time it was your turn, you heard yourself saying, "I have some minor concerns, but overall I think it's solid." You're not alone. Research shows that roughly half of employees stay silent at work rather than voice a concern. And among those who stayed quiet, 40% estimated they wasted 2 weeks or more replaying what they didn't say. Two weeks. Mentally rehearsing the point they should have made in a meeting that's already over. That silence isn't a character flaw. It's your neurology working against you. And today I'm going to show you exactly…
More episodes of The Innovators Studio with Phil McKinney
- Why Most Organizations Aren't Funding Innovation
- R&D Spending Is the Most Misleading Number in Business
- The Innovation Metric Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard Used
- The R&D Metric Mark Hurd and HP Got Wrong
- How to Build a Decision System that Protects Your Thinking
- How to Quit Defending Decisions You Know are Wrong
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Innovators Studio with Phil McKinney podcast page.