What's At Stake in Chatrie v. United States
About this episode
The episode discusses the implications of the Supreme Court case Chatrie v. United States regarding geofence warrants and privacy rights.
At the end of last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Chatrie v. United States . The case involves the use of a geofence warrant , which police use to demand information on all cellphones within a certain area and period of time. The outcome of the case, which revolves around Fourth Amendment questions, could have profound implications for location tracking and privacy in the digital age. To learn more, Tech Policy Press fellow Jake Laperruque , who is monitoring the case , spoke to Michael Price , who serves as litigation director for the Fourth Amendment Center at National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), one of the lawyers representing the plaintiff.
More episodes of The Tech Policy Press Podcast
- Why the EU's Data Center Boom Is a Black Box
- Taking the Temperature of Tech Policy Debates in Brussels at CPDP
- The Fight for Civil Rights in the Age of AI
- Unpacking the Goals of Common Sense Media's Youth AI Safety Institute
- How to Confront the Threat of AI Dictatorship
- RightsCon Organizers Take Stock of What's Next After Zambia
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Tech Policy Press Podcast podcast page.