About this episode

Chris reflects on the moral implications of admiring artists with questionable personal lives.

Today Chris reflects on artists whose art he admires, but he would never want to be like. When you think of Roald Dahl, Shel Silverstein, or even Mozart, must you boycott them when you discover things about them that you find distasteful? Today the Pugs wonder aloud, must artists be saints? Support the Theology Pugcast on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thetheologypugcast?fbclid=IwAR17UHhfzjphO52C_kkZfursA_C784t0ldFix0wyB4fd-YOJpmOQ3dyqGf8 Learn more about First Pres. Battle Ground: https://www.solochristo.org/ Connect with WileyCraft Productions: https://wileycraftproductions.com/

People in this episode

Host: Chris

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: Theology Pugcast, First Pres. Battle Ground, WileyCraft Productions

More episodes of The Theology Pugcast

• The Problem of Human Rights Law · April 27, 2026 · 1h 2m
• An Interview with Illustrator Stephen Crotts · April 13, 2026 · 1h 2m
• Is Nature Conscious? · April 6, 2026 · 1h 3m
• An Introduction to Critical Theory with Bradley G. Green · March 30, 2026 · 1h 0m
• Too Healthy for Our Own Good! · March 23, 2026 · 1h 2m
• Mother Ann Lee was Nuts: So, Why does the NPR Crowd Love Her? · March 16, 2026 · 1h 3m

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The Theology Pugcast podcast page.