School Choice, Competition vs. Spending
About this episode
The episode discusses the impact of competition on public school outcomes in Florida, highlighting research on the cost-effectiveness of competition versus increased spending.
Drew Perkins welcomes Patrick Graff, Senior Fellow at the American Federation for Children, to discuss his recent research analyzing 15 years of Florida's tax-credit scholarship program. Graff presents a compelling case for why "competition effects" may be significantly more cost-effective than simply increasing per-pupil spending for improving public school outcomes. Links & Resources Mentioned In This Episode Have some feedback you'd like to share? You can email me at drew@thoughtstretchers.org . If you enjoyed this episode, please share it and please leave a review on Apple Podcasts or wherever you're listening. The episode explores the "competition effect"—the phenomenon where public schools improve when they face the threat of losing students to nearby private options. Graff's research found that public school students in high-competition areas in Florida were 120 to 140 days ahead in reading compared to those in low-competition areas. Most strikingly, he estimates that the competition route was 11 times more cost-effective than achieving the same gains through pure spending increases. Drew and Patrick also navigate the nuances of school choice, including the role of…
More episodes of The ThoughtStretchers Podcast
- Teaching Meaning: Beyond "Just Tell Them"
- Paul Black's Legacy of Assessment for learning
- Show, Don't Just Tell: Explaining For Understanding
- Reimagining Our Pedagogy Conversations
- Is The 'What & How' We Teach Math All Wrong?
- Biologically Primary vs. Secondary Learning With David Geary
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the The ThoughtStretchers Podcast podcast page.