About this episode

The episode discusses the constitutional implications of keeping CAPF in Bengal for an extended period.

ThePrintPod: Keeping CAPF in Bengal for 60 days raises constitutional questions. It’s not an occupying force

Topics covered

• constitutional questions
• CAPF
• Bengal
• law enforcement
• occupying force

Keywords

• CAPF
• Bengal
• constitutional questions
• law enforcement
• occupying force

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: CAPF

Places: Bengal

More episodes of ThePrint

• Opinion: How Scotland protects what India neglects. Chicken Tikka Masala for a start · May 3, 2026 · 8 min
• WritingsOnTheWall: When Writings on the Wall read the realigning colours of politics in West Bengal in 2016 · May 3, 2026 · 10 min
• NationalInterest: A year after Op Sindoor, India must look east & militarise Nicobar islands urgently · May 2, 2026 · 9 min
• First Person SecondDraft: Remembering Mario Miranda: How he visualised Shekhar Gupta’s chronicle of wartime ‘Hotels in Hell’ · May 2, 2026 · 43 min
• ThePrintAM: WHY DID SC GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO PAWAN KHERA? · May 2, 2026 · 4 min
• SecurityCode: Tracing Pakistan’s influence in Middle East- From 1971 to now · May 1, 2026 · 10 min

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the ThePrint podcast page.