
The episode discusses the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. CASA regarding universal injunctions and its implications on presidential power.
On the last day of the 2024-25, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Trump v. CASA , involving the validity of universal injunctions. By a 6-3 vote, the Court granted the Trump administration’s request to limit the availability of such injunctions in a case in which the plaintiffs challenged the legality of President Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship. CASA may seem like a somewhattechnical case about equitable remedies, but in fact CASA tells us a great deal about the current Supreme Court, especially regarding its views on presidential power and separation of powers in a time of political and legal transition. Jessica Silbey, Associate Dean and Professor of Law at Boston University School of Law, discusses CASA with Associate Dean Rodger Citron on this Touro Law Review podcast.
Host: Rodger Citron
Guest: Jessica Silbey
Organizations: Touro Law Review, Boston University School of Law
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Touro Law Review Podcast podcast page.