The Lindsay Clancy Trial Mini Series: The Defence's Case
About this episode
The episode discusses the defense's case in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, focusing on postpartum psychosis and key testimonies.
After 14 days of testimony and nearly 70 witnesses presented by the prosecution, the defence in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial took the floor. Their core argument? That Lindsay should not be held criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children because she was in the depths of severe postpartum psychosis. In the latest episode of our mini-series tracking the trial, we walk through the defence's argument, led by attorney Kevin Reddington. Featuring powerful testimony from Lindsay’s mother, mother-in-law, and key psychiatric experts, the defence presents evidence to show a devoted mother begging for help, misdiagnosed, and allegedly failed by a fragmented medical system. We also examine the prosecution's rebuttal, including testimony from FBI psychiatrist Dr. Gregory Saathoff, who challenged the credibility of Lindsay’s auditory hallucinations. LINKS If any of the contents in this episode have caused distress, know that there is help available via Lifeline on 13 11 14 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636 . Contact Full Stop Australia on 1800 385 578 , 7 days, 24 hours. GET IN TOUCH Follow us on Instagram and TikTok @truecrimeconversations Want us…
More episodes of True Crime Conversations
- As ‘Below Deck’ Airs Something Sinister Was Happening Behind The Scenes
- The Lindsay Clancy Trial Mini Series: The Verdict
- Zoe’s Husband Drugged Her Evening Tea. For Years He Assaulted Her While She Slept
- The Lindsay Clancy Mini Series: A World Obsessed
- The Lindsay Clancy Trial Mini Series: The Prosecution’s Argument
- Katherine Knight Killed Her Boyfriend. Then She Served Him For Dinner
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the True Crime Conversations podcast page.