About this episode
Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos analyze the D4VD case, questioning the homicide charge and discussing the implications of the evidence presented.
Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos break down the D4VD case, questioning whether prosecutors can actually prove it was a homicide and pointing out how wording like “may” could create serious doubt. They dig into LAPD’s timeline, the delay in charges, and what the defense is likely to attack, while also debating whether the current evidence really connects him to the crime. The conversation also touches on bigger risks—possible overreach by prosecutors, controversial evidence, and strong public bias surrounding the case. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
People in this episode
Host: Harvey Levin
Guest: Mark Geragos
Topics covered
- homicide
- prosecution
- defense
- evidence
- public bias
- legal analysis
Keywords
- D4VD case
- homicide
- prosecution
- LAPD
- evidence
- public bias
- legal analysis
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: LAPD
Books & works: D4VD case
More episodes of 2 Angry Men
- Behind The Michael Jackson Verdict · June 6, 2026 · 33 min
- Mackenzie Shirilla's Lawyer Royally Screwed Up · May 30, 2026 · 35 min
- Spencer Pratt Will Kick Karen Bass’s Ass · May 23, 2026 · 35 min
- Why Harvey Levin Went After Spencer Pratt · May 17, 2026 · 36 min
- Blake Lively Lost Big in Baldoni Legal War · May 10, 2026 · 37 min
- D4vd Case: Something's Not Right · May 2, 2026 · 35 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the 2 Angry Men podcast page.