About this episode
Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos discuss Diddy’s appeal hearing and the legal arguments surrounding it.
Harvey Levin and Mark Geragos break down Diddy’s appeal hearing, where his legal team argues the so-called “freak-offs” were basically amateur porn protected by the First Amendment—not prostitution under the Mann Act. They get into whether that argument actually holds up, the sentencing dispute, and the bigger question of how the judge handled evidence tied to charges Diddy beat. Hosts: Harvey Levin & Mark Geragos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
People in this episode
Hosts: Harvey Levin, Mark Geragos
Topics covered
- legal appeal
- First Amendment
- prostitution laws
- celebrity news
- evidence handling
Keywords
- Diddy
- appeal hearing
- First Amendment
- Mann Act
- legal team
- evidence
- sentencing dispute
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: TMZ
Books & works: First Amendment, Mann Act
More episodes of 2 Angry Men
- Behind The Michael Jackson Verdict · June 6, 2026 · 33 min
- Mackenzie Shirilla's Lawyer Royally Screwed Up · May 30, 2026 · 35 min
- Spencer Pratt Will Kick Karen Bass’s Ass · May 23, 2026 · 35 min
- Why Harvey Levin Went After Spencer Pratt · May 17, 2026 · 36 min
- Blake Lively Lost Big in Baldoni Legal War · May 10, 2026 · 37 min
- D4vd Case: Something's Not Right · May 2, 2026 · 35 min
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the 2 Angry Men podcast page.