How Judges Can Use AI Without Losing Human Judgment with Justice Jerod Tufte
About this episode
The episode discusses how judges can effectively use AI while maintaining essential human judgment in their roles.
How can judges use AI without delegating the human judgment at the center of their role? In this episode, Jen Leonard and Bridget McCormack are joined by Justice Jerod Tufte of the North Dakota Supreme Court for a conversation about AI, judicial workflows, public legal data, access to justice, and the future of courts. In this episode: How judges can use AI while preserving human judgment Why AI should support, not decide, judicial work How AI can assist with records, citations, and bench memos Why courts need guardrails for AI use How AI may increase litigation volume Why public law should be accessible and AI-ready Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More episodes of AI and the Future of Law
- Kirkland’s $500 Million AI Bet and the Future of Junior Lawyers
- What Does It Mean to Be an AI-Ready Lawyer? Farrah Pepper and Kirsten Talmage on AI Competency
- What Is an AI-Native Law Firm? John Nay on Norm AI and Norm Law
- How AI Is Reshaping In-House Legal Teams with Nick Fleisher
- Can Law Firms Redesign Themselves for AI? Jen Leonard on Unprecedented
- Is Legal Tech in a Bubble? Nikki Shaver on AI Strategy and Legal Tech Growth
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the AI and the Future of Law podcast page.