Substantive Expansion - with Advisory Opinions and Divided Argument
From Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar
March 11, 2026 · 1h 21m · Season 6 · Episode 269
About this episode
The episode discusses the case Mirabelli v. Bonta and its implications for substantive due process and birthright citizenship.
Amarica’s Constitution has joined with two other great podcasts! We’re still ourselves, but today we bring all three podcasts together to look at a recent case, Mirabelli v. Bonta, which brings substantive due process back to center stage. And because we are who we are, we take a look ourselves at some more aspects of - what else? - the birthright citizenship case. Learn what the future holds for our listeners, as we bring you what we always have, and more. Attorneys and judges can gain CLE credit from podcast.njsba.com.
People in this episode
Host: Akhil Reed Amar
Topics covered
- substantive due process
- birthright citizenship
- legal analysis
- podcast collaboration
- CLE credit
Keywords
- substantive due process
- Mirabelli v. Bonta
- birthright citizenship
- legal podcast
- CLE credit
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: njsba.com
Books & works: Mirabelli v. Bonta, birthright citizenship case
More episodes of Amarica's Constitution
- Bigotry vs Bureaucracy: State Action and Private Freedom · June 10, 2026 · 1h 31m
- Rosen on Liberty; Gorsuch on Gorsuch - with Jeffrey Rosen and Justice Neil Gorsuch · June 3, 2026 · 1h 17m
- Unrehearsed Answers · May 27, 2026 · 54 min
- Scrip for Scripture on the National Mall · May 20, 2026 · 1h 22m
- JFK's Wall · May 13, 2026 · 1h 14m
- Fourteen Colonies, Ten Commandments · May 6, 2026 · 1h 35m
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Amarica's Constitution podcast page.