
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 1 chart position in 1 market.
By chart position
- 🇦🇷AR · Politics#167500 to 3K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
150 to 900🎙 Daily cadence·274 episodes·Last published 5d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
500 to 3K🇦🇷100% - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
200 to 1.2K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 17 epsHosts
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Reverence and Radicalism: Remembering Gordon Wood
Jun 19, 2026
1h 22m 57s
Bigotry vs Bureaucracy: State Action and Private Freedom
Jun 10, 2026
1h 30m 31s
Rosen on Liberty; Gorsuch on Gorsuch - with Jeffrey Rosen and Justice Neil Gorsuch
Jun 3, 2026
1h 17m 03s
Unrehearsed Answers
May 27, 2026
54m 06s
Scrip for Scripture on the National Mall
May 20, 2026
1h 22m 12s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/19/26 | ![]() Reverence and Radicalism: Remembering Gordon Wood | The tributes to Gordon Wood have been pouring in, and as promised, we spend this episode with him and his peerless body of work. Professor Steven Calabresi, Gordon’s neighbor, friend, and colleague, joins us, and how appropriate that is, as Steve and Akhil produced a tribute weekend at Yale Law School that reviewed and celebrated his lifetime of work. Now we remember the man, the teacher, and most of all, the towering scholar, as we review some of his most important ideas, his methods, and his inspiration for so many who have read, and who will read, the greatest books ever written about the American founding period. A giant has been lost, but his memory will be a blessing for many generations to come. CLE credit is available for lawyers and judges from podcast.njsba.com. | 1h 22m 57s | ||||||
| 6/10/26 | ![]() Bigotry vs Bureaucracy: State Action and Private Freedom✨ | bigotrybureaucracy+5 | — | NJSBA | Missouri | bigotrybureaucracy+5 | — | 1h 30m 31s | |
| 6/3/26 | ![]() Rosen on Liberty; Gorsuch on Gorsuch - with Jeffrey Rosen and Justice Neil Gorsuch✨ | libertySupreme Court+4 | Justice Neil Gorsuch | National Constitution CenterGW+1 | — | libertySupreme Court+5 | — | 1h 17m 03s | |
| 5/27/26 | ![]() Unrehearsed Answers✨ | listener questionscurrent events+4 | — | podcast.njsba.com | — | listener questionscurrent events+3 | — | 54m 06s | |
| 5/20/26 | ![]() Scrip for Scripture on the National Mall✨ | religious establishmentfree exercise+5 | — | AdministrationWhite House+2 | Yale | constitutional principlesreligious establishment+5 | — | 1h 22m 12s | |
| 5/13/26 | ![]() JFK's Wall✨ | religious practiceconstitutionalism+3 | — | Supreme Court | — | JFKAl Smith+5 | — | 1h 13m 41s | |
| 5/6/26 | ![]() Fourteen Colonies, Ten Commandments✨ | religious freedomgovernment and religion+4 | — | Fifth Circuitnjsba.com+1 | — | Ten CommandmentsSupreme Court+5 | — | 1h 35m 20s | |
| 4/29/26 | ![]() Remember the Alamo Heights✨ | religion in governmenthistorical origins of the constitution+4 | Sarah Isgur | podcast.njsba.comrecent book | — | constitutionreligion+5 | — | 1h 40m 28s | |
| 4/23/26 | ![]() Popes and Presidents✨ | church and stateconstitutional doctrine+3 | Sarah Isgur | Last Branch Standing | — | church and stateconstitutional doctrine+5 | — | 1h 35m 25s | |
| 4/15/26 | ![]() Last Branch Stands, The Barbara Court Sits - Special Guest Sarah Isgur✨ | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+3 | Cecilia WangSarah Isgur | Advisory OpinionsLast Branch Standing | — | Supreme Courtbirthright citizenship+5 | — | 1h 42m 57s | |
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 4/8/26 | ![]() New World, Same Constitution✨ | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+3 | — | Supreme CourtSolicitor General+1 | — | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+3 | — | 2h 06m 28s | |
| 4/1/26 | ![]() Crib Sheets for Barbara✨ | Supreme Courtlegal arguments+4 | — | ACLU | — | Supreme CourtTrump v. Barbara+5 | — | 1h 07m 18s | |
| 3/25/26 | ![]() Created to Born to Barbara✨ | birthright citizenshipSupreme Court+3 | Andy | Born Equal | Garden City, NYLincoln+1 | All Men Are Created Equalbirthright citizenship+3 | — | 58m 47s | |
| 3/18/26 | ![]() A Brief Ecosystem✨ | birthright citizenshiplegal analysis+3 | — | Trump v. Barbara | — | birthright citizenshipamicus brief+3 | — | 1h 15m 44s | |
| 3/11/26 | ![]() Substantive Expansion - with Advisory Opinions and Divided Argument✨ | substantive due processbirthright citizenship+3 | — | njsba.comMirabelli v. Bonta+1 | — | substantive due processMirabelli v. Bonta+3 | — | 1h 20m 39s | |
| 3/4/26 | ![]() Attorney Amar's Opening Argument✨ | Supreme Courtlegal arguments+3 | — | — | — | Supreme CourtTrump v. Barbara+3 | — | 28m 37s | |
| 2/27/26 | ![]() Tariffs Are A Major Question - Special Guest Vikram Amar✨ | tariffsMajor Questions Doctrine+5 | Vikram Amar | Courtpodcast.njsba.com | — | tariffsMajor Questions Doctrine+5 | — | 1h 22m 55s | |
| 2/18/26 | ![]() Pillorying the Post✨ | mediajournalism+3 | Ruth Marcus | Washington Post | — | Washington PostJeff Bezos+5 | — | 1h 21m 16s | |
| 2/12/26 | ![]() Converse-1983 Is A Thing | It’s becoming apparent that the theory that Professor Amar put forth 40 years ago in a now-famous law review article, Of Sovereignty And Federalism, is being taken seriously by more and more legislatures, newspapers, and the general public. Therefore, we bring the two leading experts on this – Professor Akhil Amar, and his brother Professor Vik Amar - together to go over the background, theory, and intricacies of this important development. It’s a master class that takes you back to an earlier master class we had, on the venerable and crucial case of McCulloch v. Maryland. What does this have to do with converse 1983? You’ll find out. CLE credit is available for lawyers and judges from podcast.njsba.com. | 1h 12m 31s | ||||||
| 2/4/26 | ![]() A Virtuous Republic, If You Can Keep It | In a wide-ranging episode, we finish looking back - and in doing so, we look into the near future as well. The birthright citizenship case will be heard in oral argument on April 1, and we go back to our reaction to the executive order. Unitary executive matters are awaiting court rulings; we look back at our back and forth with Steven Calabresi. Meanwhile, audience questions on court term limits and the virtues of virtue are addressed, and there are more tidbits to enjoy. | 1h 09m 49s | ||||||
| 1/28/26 | ![]() Five-Oh and Four Questions | The look back over our five years of drama, humor, reason, and illogic continues, as perhaps the most notorious opinion of the five year period - the Trump immunity case - reappears in a clip, along with a revisit with Justice Breyer. Meanwhile, the oral argument in Wolford v. Lopez did, in fact, prompt the Professors Amar to write in SCOTUSblog.com, and we go even further here, with clips from that oral argument and answers to the justices that didn’t find their way into the record, but now, hopefully, enter the public discourse. CLE credit is available as usual for lawyers and judges from podcast.njsba.com. | 1h 23m 54s | ||||||
| 1/21/26 | ![]() High Fives | It’s five years of Akhil and Andy on Amarica’s Constitution, and our friends are lining up to talk about it. In typical fashion, it’s not just testimonials but reflections. And we do a clip episode, but this time it’s not the justices, or the oral advocates, or the pundits, on the hot seat: it’s us. We look back at two episodes per year, playing our sometimes correct, sometimes wildly wrong predictions, and our sometimes prescient, sometimes widely ignored so-called insights. It’s been quite a ride, and quite a recap - so much so that this part one of at least two. And still, after five years, CLE credit remains available for lawyers and judges from podcast.njsba.com. | 1h 43m 57s | ||||||
| 1/14/26 | ![]() The Minnesota Massacre | A powerful and aggressive central government sends unwanted forces in huge numbers to a city where the residents oppose and resent this policy. The undertrained forces unleash violence against the population in the form of an obviously wrongful death. Minneapolis, yes - but also a seeming repeat of an important American historic event, that shaped a nation’s core beliefs, later reflected in the Declaration and the Constitution. We tell those stories, and look at the values and basic laws that emerged from them; bring to light important Supreme Court cases - and bring all this to Minneapolis for examination of how they apply, 250 years later. CLE credit is available for lawyers and judges from podcast.njsba.com. | 54m 15s | ||||||
| 1/7/26 | ![]() Venezuelan Frisbie | The military capture of the Venezuelan leader, Maduro, is an event with giant international strategic, moral, economic, political, and other considerations. It also raises fascinating constitutional questions, and Professor Amar is ready to discuss some matters that probably did not come to your mind right away. Much of this stems from the fact that Maduro will be tried in a U.S. civilian, not a military court, so constitutional protections are implicated. Whatever your thoughts about the policy matters, it behooves you to join us in this exploration of how this escapade reveals a strain in constitutional doctrine that remains unresolved. Meanwhile, you will learn of cases with names like “Frisbie,” hence our title. CLE credit is available for lawyers and judges at podcast.njsba.com. | 1h 21m 22s | ||||||
| 12/31/25 | ![]() Your Questions, Easy and Hard | Our listeners have a talent for inquiry; they follow Professor Amar’s arguments every week, and come up with their own. This week, we end the year by fielding a wide range of questions, including some related to presidential oath-taking; juries, asked by a Judge; pardons and their abuse; and many related topics. Akhil invokes Angela Bassett and Tina Turner, as we answer the questions first softly, and then not so softly. And we end the year with fond wishes sincerely offered. CLE credit is available for lawyers and judges from podcast.njsba.com. | 1h 43m 00s | ||||||
Showing 25 of 283
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
