How It Should Have Happened – Ep.366 – The Great Debate – A Synopsis – Part 1

How It Should Have Happened – Ep.366 – The Great Debate – A Synopsis – Part 1

From Cave To The Cross Apologetics by Patrick And Tony

April 13, 2026 · 12 min · Episode 366

About this episode

The episode discusses a hypothetical debate structure between Bahnsen and Stein, focusing on the arguments presented.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCgZKgw9TtU Evil, Miracles, & Atheist Faith Tony’s going to be out for a bit, so the next four episodes will be on the shorter end, but that’s ok. Here, the editor of the book, Joshua Pillows, structures the debate on what might have been the case if Stein had been prepared to deal with Bahnsen’s actual argument. So this is how it should have happened, and we start with Bahnsen’s opening statement. TIMELINE: 00:00 – Introduction 04:03 – The Embarrassing Dr. Stein 05:34 – Bahnsen’s Opening Statement Redux 07:13 – A Battle Of Worldviews 09:22 – The Issue With The Naturalistic Atheist Worldview 11:47 – Conclusion BOOK LINKS: The Great Debate – Does God Exist? – Edited and Commentary by Joshua Pillows Debate Transcript Video The Bahnsen Institute       All episodes, short clips, & blog – https://www.cavetothecross.com

People in this episode

Host: Tony

Topics covered

  • debate
  • atheism
  • worldviews
  • miracles
  • Christianity

Keywords

  • debate
  • Bahnsen
  • Stein
  • atheism
  • miracles
  • worldviews

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: The Bahnsen Institute

Books & works: The Great Debate – Does God Exist?

More episodes of Cave To The Cross Apologetics

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Cave To The Cross Apologetics podcast page.